By combining historical research, contemporary oncological practice, and the perspective of AI for this particular application, the project offers a comprehensive understanding of how these criteria shaped treatment decisions, drug approval processes, and patient outcomes. It also investigates the broader implications for public health, offering insights into how such criteria influence policy and global health standards, particularly through collaborations with the WHO.
Rethinking RECIST brings together the expertise of cancer scientists and physicians, historians, and policy experts. The project will utilise a literature review, archival research, and oral history interviews to provide an in-depth examination of RECIST’s development and impact. These findings have the potential to significantly enhance our understanding of response assessment methods and prevent the repetition of past mistakes, ultimately guiding the development of improved cancer treatment evaluation criteria and setting the stage for the development of new, more accurate clinical trial protocols, with an emphasis on improving patient care and promoting equitable health outcomes.